For a hearing to be held, what is required if a party waives their right?

The correct response is that the director may proceed without a hearing if a party waives their right. This provision allows the decision-making process to continue efficiently, ensuring that resources are not spent on a hearing when one party has chosen to forgo that option. A waiver signifies that the party involved does not wish to contest or present their case further, thus allowing the director to make a decision based on the available information and evidence without the need for additional proceedings. This process is important in administrative settings, where timely resolutions are beneficial for all parties involved.

The other choices involve stipulations that would unnecessarily complicate the procedure if a party has already waived their right to a hearing. For instance, requiring a written waiver or the presence of a representative would further prolong matters when the goal is to streamline the process after a waiver has been given. Furthermore, submitting evidence would imply a need for hearings or further deliberation, which contradicts the notion of waiving that right.