What action can the director take for good cause shown regarding an order entered without a hearing?

The director has the authority to set aside an order that was entered without a hearing, which allows for the proceedings to continue in a manner that ensures fairness and due process. This action is grounded in the principle that parties should have the opportunity to present their cases and arguments in a formal setting, thus allowing for a more complete and just decision-making process.

Setting aside an order permits the director to rectify any potential errors or oversights that may have occurred due to the absence of a hearing. This is crucial in regulatory practices where the rights and interests of involved parties must be adequately considered before final decisions are made. By allowing the proceedings to continue, all parties are granted the chance to engage fully in the process, ultimately leading to outcomes that are more informed and equitable.

Other responses may lack this sense of due process or corrective action. For instance, imposing fines or rejecting a petition outright does not allow for reconsideration or proper examination of the issues at hand. Moreover, scheduling a new hearing without conditions might not adequately address the need for procedural fairness, which is the primary focus of setting aside an order.