Which of the following is true about the fees for continuation?

In Idaho's regulations concerning fees for continuation, it is correct that they are non-refundable once paid. This is an important principle in many licensing and regulatory scenarios because it emphasizes the finality and the obligation of the applicant to fulfill their financial responsibilities associated with licensing or renewal processes.

Non-refundable fees help ensure that administrative costs associated with processing applications, reviews, and regulatory management are covered, regardless of whether the application ultimately proceeds or the license is ultimately maintained. Understanding this aspect of the regulations is crucial for anyone involved in the licensing process, as it underscores the importance of commitment to responsibilities once fees are submitted.

The other options may suggest potential misunderstandings of typical regulatory practices. For instance, the idea that fees could be refundable or transferable could create opportunities for complications or mismanagement within the regulatory framework, which is typically designed to uphold integrity and consistency in handling fees and licensing processes. The allowance for installment payments may also introduce additional risks concerning compliance and tracking obligations, thus reinforcing the regulatory stance that fees must be treated as definitive upon payment.